In 1961, Dr. Frank Drake from the National Radio Astronomy
Observatory in Green Bank, West Virginia, envisioned a method to estimate how
many civilizations with advanced forms of life exist in the Milky Way galaxy. His
approach has come to be known as “the Drake equation”, and although developed
simply as a means of estimation, the equation has prompted much controversy
within the scientific community over the years. The equation is written as
follows:
N = R* x fp x ne x fl x fi
x fc x L (explanation attached below)
Drake conceived his equation as a way to encourage dialogue
at the first ever SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) meeting. Most
people in the scientific community understand that the importance of the Drake
equation is not to solve for an actual value of N, but rather to stimulate
contemplation and research. The concept has been attributed a fair amount of
popular interest and support, resulting in some continual funding of the SETI
research.
Further research into the Drake equation actually has some
astronomers close to agreement on the product of the first three terms (R* x fp
x ne). That said, the fractions related to life and intelligence are
still largely based on conjecture. It’s these uncertain pieces to the question
that have warranted harsh criticism about the equation. Science fiction author,
Michael Crichton, describes this ambiguity saying, “the Drake equation can have
any value from ‘billions and billions’ to zero…Speaking precisely [it] is
literally meaningless”.
This idea posed by Dr. Frank Drake is very similar to Thales
of Miletus questioning the origins of the universe. Drake himself knew very
well that his first estimation of advanced civilizations in the galaxy would be
tremendously off. But in doing so, he opened the doors to future scientists who
would one day likely come to a much more accurate estimation. Drake succeeded
in stimulating conversation about the topic, and in turn set the stage for
further investigation on how to experimentally narrow in on a closer approximation.

Daniel, I really enjoyed this post about where the Drake Equation comes from. I took a class last semester with Professor Bell that was all about the different terms of the Drake Equation and what we believe are relatively accurate estimations for the values of the different variables, and how we determine them. I completely agree that the first three variables are all possible to estimate with relative precision, and that as you go further down the line, the values of the variables almost turns into pure conjecture and guessing. For example, estimating the fraction of planets with life that develop intelligent life is nearly impossible to predict with any accuracy whatsoever. My only criticism comes from the quote from Michael Crichton, saying that the value of the drake equation can range from billions to 0. I would argue that it could range to a very small number, like .00000001, but if we say it ranges all the way to 0, then how are we here? If we say the value of the Drake Equation is 0, then you are saying that we don't exist, and I'd like to think that we do indeed exist (hah!). Again, I enjoyed your post, and think that you found a really interesting topic to talk about!
ReplyDelete