Saturday, February 15, 2014

The Drake Equation: Daniel Cowher

In 1961, Dr. Frank Drake from the National Radio Astronomy Observatory in Green Bank, West Virginia, envisioned a method to estimate how many civilizations with advanced forms of life exist in the Milky Way galaxy. His approach has come to be known as “the Drake equation”, and although developed simply as a means of estimation, the equation has prompted much controversy within the scientific community over the years. The equation is written as follows:

N = R* x fp x ne x fl x fi x fc x L (explanation attached below)

Drake conceived his equation as a way to encourage dialogue at the first ever SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) meeting. Most people in the scientific community understand that the importance of the Drake equation is not to solve for an actual value of N, but rather to stimulate contemplation and research. The concept has been attributed a fair amount of popular interest and support, resulting in some continual funding of the SETI research. 

Further research into the Drake equation actually has some astronomers close to agreement on the product of the first three terms (R* x fp x ne). That said, the fractions related to life and intelligence are still largely based on conjecture. It’s these uncertain pieces to the question that have warranted harsh criticism about the equation. Science fiction author, Michael Crichton, describes this ambiguity saying, “the Drake equation can have any value from ‘billions and billions’ to zero…Speaking precisely [it] is literally meaningless”.

This idea posed by Dr. Frank Drake is very similar to Thales of Miletus questioning the origins of the universe. Drake himself knew very well that his first estimation of advanced civilizations in the galaxy would be tremendously off. But in doing so, he opened the doors to future scientists who would one day likely come to a much more accurate estimation. Drake succeeded in stimulating conversation about the topic, and in turn set the stage for further investigation on how to experimentally narrow in on a closer approximation.

(N is the number of civilizations in the Milky Way whose electromagnetic emissions are detectable. R* is the rate of formation of new stars. fp is the fraction of those stars with planets. ne is the number of planets suitable for life per solar system. fl is the fraction of suitable planets where life occurs, fi is the fraction of planets with life that develop intelligent life, fc is the fraction of intelligent civilizations that develop space technology, and L is the length of time advanced civilizations emit signals into space.)


https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~scranmer/SPD/crichton.html

1 comment:

  1. Daniel, I really enjoyed this post about where the Drake Equation comes from. I took a class last semester with Professor Bell that was all about the different terms of the Drake Equation and what we believe are relatively accurate estimations for the values of the different variables, and how we determine them. I completely agree that the first three variables are all possible to estimate with relative precision, and that as you go further down the line, the values of the variables almost turns into pure conjecture and guessing. For example, estimating the fraction of planets with life that develop intelligent life is nearly impossible to predict with any accuracy whatsoever. My only criticism comes from the quote from Michael Crichton, saying that the value of the drake equation can range from billions to 0. I would argue that it could range to a very small number, like .00000001, but if we say it ranges all the way to 0, then how are we here? If we say the value of the Drake Equation is 0, then you are saying that we don't exist, and I'd like to think that we do indeed exist (hah!). Again, I enjoyed your post, and think that you found a really interesting topic to talk about!

    ReplyDelete