Friday, February 7, 2014

Fossil Fuel Crisis: Nik Singh

The controversy over American overdependence on fossil fuels (Coal, oil, and natural gas) has been a large part of American politics in recent years. We use fossil fuels for the majority of our energy needs, like electricity, heating, and fuel for automobiles. The world currently consumes 400 quadrillion British Thermal Units of energy each year. (For reference, a BTU can be compared to the energy and heat that is released by a match.) Currently Fossil fuels are supplying an incredible 88% of this energy demand.

There are several reasons why fossil fuels are controversial. Firstly, they are non-renewable which means we will one day run out of fossil fuel supply. Secondly, they have negative effects on the environment. Burning fossil fuels contributes to global warming by increasing the amount of Carbon Dioxide in the air. Burning fossil fuels also results in air pollution. It is estimated that the soot emitted from Coal-burning electricity plants leads to the premature deaths of 60,000 individuals each year. Lastly, fossil fuels like oil can be hazardous to the environment like in the recent British Petroleum Oil Spill.

                                                                     http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/CarbonEmissions.jpg



The government has started to fund renewable energy projects in recent years. For example, in 2009 the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act gave 16.8 Billion to the office of energy efficiency and renewable energy to fund core projects. More recently, in 2012, renewable energy funding reached 257 billions dollars.


While funding is headed in the right direction, it is my opinion that the rate of change towards renewables is not yet fast enough. I believe that the government needs to not only increase funding, but also allocate it in a more efficient manner. I believe that renewable energy companies need more government funding in order to compete with fossil fuel companies that have had years to build a large capital base. If we do not increase government funding of renewables, then the private markets will side with fossil fuels simply because they are currently the cheaper alternative. This is largely because private markets do not account for the negative externalities costs caused by fossil fuels. The Government must act and it must act fast.




(Source: US Department of Energy).







No comments:

Post a Comment